Wedge1024's game Reviews on Newgrounds

[Dragon Slayer (demo)]

Pretty good

To all the peeops who have been whining to see the full game - check the submission date of this.. _2000_. It has been three years. I would imagine it's safe to say the author either abandoned it or didnt release it on ng.

[3 GAME ARCADE]

bad

the first two games have lousy controls and little explanation. The concepts were good, the execution was just wrong. The worst part of these games though (which you can really tell in tic-tac-toe) is the AI. It will do the exact same pattern every single time. How about getting your games past a beta stage before submitting?

[----- Green Ridge -----]

(insert witty comment here)

Well, it just wansn't quite what I expected. I expected it to be a lot longer and harder. Don't get me wrong, what ou made here was excellent and I loved it, it's just that it didn't live up to what your demo made me think it would be.

SpeedyPac responds:

I am truely sorry that this game did not meet what your expectations. I did try hard on this, it was the best thing i've ever made. Maybe you'll enjoy something that i make in the future!

[Idiot Test]

...

All you did was copy the text from an email that has been going around for years into different frames, added buttons, and the pointless ability to type. This took, what?, one hour?

[Uh Oh For Gogo]

interesting

when i first heard the music i thought Atari :-) almost made me wish for that type of grafic too. pretty funny. you should make one long level. :-)

[Kentucky Space Battles]

well, if you must ask...

as 90% of the reviews have said, sound (thusly, the ding in my scoring). ok, i said it, that's out of the way. NOW -

Any idiot who gives this a bad score because it has "sucky grafics" or "poor controls" obviously never played the original Sopwith. IIRC, Sopwith had the same control scheme, did it not? Beautiful game! I would play it longer, but I don't want to become addicted like I did with Sopwith. ^^